| Status | Revision in Progress |
|---|---|
| Owner | |
| Stakeholders |
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create Inspection Methods in S/4HANA.
Inspection Methods are master data objects in SAP Quality Management (QM) that describe how inspections are to be carried out. They specify the procedure, tools, or references to be used for measuring or evaluating inspection characteristics, and can include documents such as test instructions, work instructions, or external references. This feature ensures standardized execution of quality inspections across plants, materials, and processes.
In SAP S/4HANA, the structure and usage of inspection methods remain consistent with SAP ECC. Inspection methods are typically created at the plant level and assigned to master inspection characteristics (MICs) or directly to inspection plan characteristics. Methods may also include language-dependent descriptions, versioning, validity dates, and document references.
In SAP ECC, aside from the standard structure of inspection method master data (method number, version, plant, and description), additional combinations may exist, such as methods assigned to specific catalogs, methods linked to custom documentation, or methods maintained with plant-independent validity. Some legacy ECC systems may also contain methods with non-standard extensions or inactive versions that need to be reviewed and cleansed (pending MDS).
This conversion aims to migrate active and relevant inspection method records from existing ECC systems into S/4HANA by applying the required transformation logic using Syniti as the data migration and transformation platform. The converted records will be loaded into the target S/4HANA system using standard SAP mechanisms such as BAPIs (e.g., BAPI_INSPECTIONMETHOD_CREATE), IDOCs, or direct table loads where applicable, ensuring consistency, compliance, and reusability in quality processes.
Conversion Scope
The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active 1043 Inspection Methods from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the Inspection Method Master Data Design Standard.
The data from legacy system includes:
Active Inspection Methods used within the last three (3) years in inspection plans or master inspection characteristics.
Inspection Methods without deletion flag.
Plant-specific and global Inspection Methods that will be migrated to the To-Be Plant Mapping (taking into consideration the To-Be definition of Plants).
Inspection Methods referenced in active MICs or inspection plans.
The data from legacy system excludes:
Inactive Inspection Methods not used in more than three (3) years.
Inspection Methods marked for deletion.
Inspection Methods belonging to deleted plants (per To-Be Plant mapping).
Obsolete or duplicate Inspection Methods that are no longer relevant (e.g., replaced by harmonized corporate standards).
| Source | Scope | Source Approx No. of Records | Target System | Target Approx No. of Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF2/WP2 | Inspection Methods will be extracted from PF2 and WP2 | PF2 = records WP2 = records | S/4 HANA | records |
| DCT | Inspection Methods for Plant / Inspection Plan which do not have data existing from PF2 and WP2 | TBD | S/4 HANA | TBD |
Additional Information
Multi-language Requirement
Inspection Method description will be maintained in English by default.
Since multi-language support is available for Inspection Method, users logging in with a different language will see the description displayed in their logon language, provided that the corresponding language key has been maintained in the on Inspection Method.
Document Management
None identified. The conversion scope is limited to the migration of Inspection Method object. No document attachments, images, or supporting files are included.
Legal Requirement
Not applicable
Special Requirements
Not applicable
Target Design
Inspection Method strictly adheres to the Master Data Standard. The complete information of the tables and key fields that hold the Inspection Method information follows the Master Data Standard document.
The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.
| Table | Field | Data Element | Field Description | Data Type | Length | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMTB | WERKS | Q_METH_PLANT | Plant for Inspection Method | CHAR | 4 | R |
| QMTB | PMTNR | QPMETHODE | Inspection Method (ID) | CHAR (ALPHA) | 8 | R |
| QMTB | VERSION | QVERSNRPM | Version Number of Inspection Method | CHAR (ALPHA) | 6 | R |
| QMTB | GUELTIGAB | DATUV | Valid-From Date | DATS | 8 | R |
| QMTB | SORTFELD | QSORTFELD | Search Field (keyword) | CHAR | 40 | R |
| QMTB | PRFQL | QPRQUALIF | Inspector Qualification (from TQ11) | CHAR | 5 | C |
| QMTB | QAUTH | QMASTAUTH | Authorization Group (QM basic data) | CHAR | 8 | C |
| QMTB | LSPER | QVERW | “Data Record Is Used” indicator | CHAR | 1 | C |
| QMTB | LOEKZ | QLOESCHKZ | Deletion / Status of Master Record | CHAR | 1 | C |
| QMTB | AUTOR | QERSTELLER | Created By | CHAR | 12 | C |
| QMTB | DATES | QDATUMERST | Created On | DATS | 8 | C |
| QMTB | AEAUT | QAENDERER | Last Changed By | CHAR | 12 | C |
| QMTB | DATAE | QDATUMAEND | Last Changed On | DATS | 8 | C |
| QMTB | MANDT | MANDT | Client | CLNT | 3 | NU |
| QMTT | WERKS | Q_METH_PLANT | Plant for Inspection Method | CHAR | 4 | R |
| QMTT | PMTNR | QPMETHODE | Inspection Method (ID) | CHAR | 8 | R |
| QMTT | VERSION | QVERSNRPM_TXT | Version Number for Method Text | CHAR | 6 | R |
| QMTT | SPRACHE | SPRAS | Language Key | LANG | 1 | R (texts are language-dependent) |
| QMTT | GUELTIGAB | DATUV | Valid-From Date | DATS | 8 | R (text validity) |
| QMTT | KURZTEXT | QKURZTEXT | Short Text (method description) | CHAR | 40 | R (per language) |
| QMTT | LTEXTKZ | QLTEXTMT | Long Text Exists (flag) | CHAR | 1 | C |
| QMTT | GELOESCHT | QGEL | Text Record Deleted | CHAR | 1 | C |
| QMTT | MANDT | MANDT | Client | CLNT | 3 | NU |
Data Cleansing
| ID | Criticality | Error Message/Report Description | Rule | Output | Source System |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1043_001 | C1 | Invalid or inactive Plant Assignment | Inspection method (QMTB) is created for a plant that does not exist or is inactive in Plant Master (T001W). | Plant | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_002 | C1 | Missing or invalid Method ID | Inspection method number (QMTB-PMTNR) is blank, duplicated, or not aligned with naming convention. | Method ID | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_003 | C1 | Method not released or obsolete | Method record is flagged for deletion (QMTB-LOEKZ) or has status that is not active. Only active methods should be migrated. | Inspection Method | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_004 | C1 | Invalid or missing Version | Method version (QMTB-VERSION) is missing, invalid, or duplicated. Each method must have a valid version. | Version | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_005 | C1 | Invalid Validity Date | Valid-from date (QMTB-GUELTIGAB) is in the future or expired (Valid-to date before cutover). | Validity Dates | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_006 | C1 | Missing or invalid Short Text | Method description (QMTT-KURZTEXT) missing in key business languages. | Method Text | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_007 | C1 | Orphaned Method Reference | Inspection plan characteristic (PLMK) references an inspection method (QMTB) that does not exist or is inactive. | Inspection Plan Link | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_008 | C2 | Duplicate Methods | Multiple active inspection methods exist with the same Plant + Method ID + Version combination. | Inspection Method | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_009 | C2 | Missing Long Texts | Method flagged for long text (QMTT-LTEXTKZ) but no SO10 text maintained. | Long Text | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_010 | C2 | Invalid Inspector Qualification | Method requires inspector qualification (QMTB-PRFQL) not available in customizing (TQ11). | Qualification | PF2/WP2 |
| 1043_011 | C3 | Obsolete Custom Fields | Method contains legacy/custom fields that do not exist in S/4HANA; must be mapped or cleared. | Mapping Issue | PF2/WP2 |
Conversion Process
The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:
The ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process is a structured approach to data migration and management, ensuring high-quality data is seamlessly transferred across systems. Here’s a breakdown of its key components:
1. Extraction
The process begins with extracting metadata and raw data from source systems, such as Syensqo ECC system (i.e. WP2/PF2) periodically. The extracted data is then staged for transformation.
2. Transformation
Once extracted, the data undergoes cleansing, consolidation, and governance. This step ensures data integrity, consistency, and compliance with business rules. The transformation process includes:
- Data validation to remove inconsistencies.
- Standardization to align formats across datasets.
- Business rule application to refine data for operational use.
3. Loading
The transformed data is then loaded into the target S/4HANA system.
Data Privacy and Sensitivity
Not applicableExtraction
Extract data from a source into . There are 2 possibilities:
- The data exists. connects to the source and loads the data into . There are 3 methods:
- Perform full data extraction from relevant tables in the source system(s).
- Perform extraction through the application layer.
- Only if ; cannot connect to the source, data is loaded to the repository from the provided source system extract/report.
- The data does not exist (or cannot be converted from its current state). The data is manually collected by the business directly in . This is to be conducted using DCT (Data Collection Template) in
The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads
Extraction Run Sheet
| Req # | Requirement Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction Scope Definition | - Identify the source systems and databases involved. - Define the data objects (tables, fields, records) to be extracted. - Establish business rules for data selection. | Syniti / LTC Data team |
| Extraction Methodology | - Specify the extraction approach (full, incremental, or delta extraction). - Determine the tools and technologies used. - Define data filtering criteria to exclude irrelevant records. | Syniti |
| Extraction Execution Plan | - Establish execution timelines and batch processing schedules. - Assign responsibilities for extraction monitoring. - Document dependencies on other migration tasks. | Syniti |
| Data Quality and Validation | - Define error handling mechanisms for extraction failures. | Syniti |
Selection Screen
| Selection Ref Screen | Parameter Name | Selection Type | Requirement | Value to be entered/set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not applicable | ||||
Data Collection Template (DCT)
Target Ready Data Collection Template will be created for data with exception of some fields which require transformation as mentioned in the transformation rule.DCT Rules
| Field Name | Field Description | Rule |
|---|---|---|
Extraction Dependencies
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation
The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow to make the data Target ready:
- Perform value mapping and data transformation rules.
- Legacy values are mapped to the to-be values (this could include a default value)
- Values are transformed according to the rules defined in
- Prepare target-ready data in the structure and format that is required for loading via prescribed Load Tool. This step also produces the load data ready for business to perform Pre-load Data Validation
Transformation Run Sheet
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Transformation Rules
| Rule # | Source system | Source Table | Source Field | Source Description | Target System | Target Table | Target Field | Target Description | Transformation Logic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transformation Mapping
| Mapping Table Name | Mapping Table Description |
|---|---|
Transformation Dependencies
List the steps that need to occur before transformation can commence| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Pre-Load Validation
Project Team
Completeness
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Accuracy
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Business
Completeness
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Accuracy
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Load
The load process includes:
- Execute the automated data load into target system using load tool or product the load file if the load must be done manually
- Once the data is loaded to the target system, it will be extracted and prepared for Post Load Data Validation
Load Run Sheet
| Item # | Step Description | Team Responsible |
|---|---|---|
Load Phase and Dependencies
Configuration
| Item # | Configuration Item |
|---|---|
Conversion Objects
| Object # | Preceding Object Conversion Approach |
|---|---|
| list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram) | |
Error Handling
| Error Type | Error Description | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|
Post-Load Validation
Project Team
Completeness
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Accuracy
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Business
Completeness
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Accuracy
| Task | Action |
|---|---|
Key Assumptions
- Master Data Standard is up to date as on the date of documenting this conversion approach and data load.
- is in scope based on data design and any exception requested by business.
See also
Change log
Workflow history
| Title | Last Updated By | Updated | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| There are no pages at the moment. | ||||
