You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Status

  Revision in Progress

Owner
Stakeholders


Purpose

The purpose of this document is to define the conversion approach to create Inspection Methods in S/4HANA.

Inspection Methods are master data objects in SAP Quality Management (QM) that describe how inspections are to be carried out. They specify the procedure, tools, or references to be used for measuring or evaluating inspection characteristics, and can include documents such as test instructions, work instructions, or external references. This feature ensures standardized execution of quality inspections across plants, materials, and processes.

In SAP S/4HANA, the structure and usage of inspection methods remain consistent with SAP ECC. Inspection methods are typically created at the plant level and assigned to master inspection characteristics (MICs) or directly to inspection plan characteristics. Methods may also include language-dependent descriptions, versioning, validity dates, and document references.

In SAP ECC, aside from the standard structure of inspection method master data (method number, version, plant, and description), additional combinations may exist, such as methods assigned to specific catalogs, methods linked to custom documentation, or methods maintained with plant-independent validity. Some legacy ECC systems may also contain methods with non-standard extensions or inactive versions that need to be reviewed and cleansed (pending MDS).

This conversion aims to migrate active and relevant inspection method records from existing ECC systems into S/4HANA by applying the required transformation logic using Syniti as the data migration and transformation platform. The converted records will be loaded into the target S/4HANA system using standard SAP mechanisms such as BAPIs (e.g., BAPI_INSPECTIONMETHOD_CREATE), IDOCs, or direct table loads where applicable, ensuring consistency, compliance, and reusability in quality processes.



Conversion Scope

The scope of this document covers the approach for converting active 1043 Inspection Methods from Legacy Source Systems into S/4HANA following the Inspection Method Master Data Design Standard.

The data from legacy system includes:

  1. Active Inspection Methods used within the last three (3) years in inspection plans or master inspection characteristics.

  2. Inspection Methods without deletion flag.

  3. Plant-specific and global Inspection Methods that will be migrated to the To-Be Plant Mapping (taking into consideration the To-Be definition of Plants).

  4. Inspection Methods referenced in active MICs or inspection plans.

The data from legacy system excludes:

  1. Inactive Inspection Methods not used in more than three (3) years.

  2. Inspection Methods marked for deletion.

  3. Inspection Methods belonging to deleted plants (per To-Be Plant mapping).

  4. Obsolete or duplicate Inspection Methods that are no longer relevant (e.g., replaced by harmonized corporate standards).


List of source systems and approximate number of records
SourceScope

Source Approx No. of Records

Target SystemTarget Approx

No. of Records

PF2/WP2

Inspection Methods will be extracted from PF2 and WP2

PF2 = records

WP2 = records

S/4 HANA

records

DCT

Inspection Methods for Plant / Inspection Plan  which do not have data existing from PF2 and WP2

TBDS/4 HANATBD










Additional Information

Multi-language Requirement

Not applicable

Document Management

None identified. The conversion scope is limited to the migration of Inspection Method object. No document attachments, images, or supporting files are included.

Legal Requirement

Not applicable

Special Requirements

Not applicable


Target Design

Inspection Method strictly adheres to the Master Data Standard. The complete information of the tables and key fields that hold the Inspection Method information follows the Master Data Standard document.

The technical design of the target for this conversion approach.

TableFieldData ElementField DescriptionData TypeLengthRequirement
QMTBWERKSQ_METH_PLANTPlant for Inspection MethodCHAR4R
QMTBPMTNRQPMETHODEInspection Method (ID)CHAR (ALPHA)8R
QMTBVERSIONQVERSNRPMVersion Number of Inspection MethodCHAR (ALPHA)6R
QMTBGUELTIGABDATUVValid-From DateDATS8R
QMTBSORTFELDQSORTFELDSearch Field (keyword)CHAR40R
QMTBPRFQLQPRQUALIFInspector Qualification (from TQ11)CHAR5C
QMTBQAUTHQMASTAUTHAuthorization Group (QM basic data)CHAR8C
QMTBLSPERQVERW“Data Record Is Used” indicatorCHAR1C
QMTBLOEKZQLOESCHKZDeletion / Status of Master RecordCHAR1C
QMTBAUTORQERSTELLERCreated ByCHAR12C
QMTBDATESQDATUMERSTCreated OnDATS8C
QMTBAEAUTQAENDERERLast Changed ByCHAR12C
QMTBDATAEQDATUMAENDLast Changed OnDATS8C
QMTBMANDTMANDTClientCLNT3NU
QMTTWERKSQ_METH_PLANTPlant for Inspection MethodCHAR4R
QMTTPMTNRQPMETHODEInspection Method (ID)CHAR8R
QMTTVERSIONQVERSNRPM_TXTVersion Number for Method TextCHAR6R
QMTTSPRACHESPRASLanguage KeyLANG1R (texts are language-dependent)
QMTTGUELTIGABDATUVValid-From DateDATS8R (text validity)
QMTTKURZTEXTQKURZTEXTShort Text (method description)CHAR40R (per language)
QMTTLTEXTKZQLTEXTMTLong Text Exists (flag)CHAR1C
QMTTGELOESCHTQGELText Record DeletedCHAR1C
QMTTMANDTMANDTClientCLNT3NU


Data Cleansing

IDCriticalityError Message/Report DescriptionRuleOutputSource System

C1Invalid or inactive Plant AssignmentInspection method (QMTB) is created for a plant that does not exist or is inactive in Plant Master (T001W).PlantPF2/WP2

C1Missing or invalid Method IDInspection method number (QMTB-PMTNR) is blank, duplicated, or not aligned with naming convention.Method IDPF2/WP2

C1Method not released or obsoleteMethod record is flagged for deletion (QMTB-LOEKZ) or has status that is not active. Only active methods should be migrated.Inspection MethodPF2/WP2

C1Invalid or missing VersionMethod version (QMTB-VERSION) is missing, invalid, or duplicated. Each method must have a valid version.VersionPF2/WP2

C1Invalid Validity DateValid-from date (QMTB-GUELTIGAB) is in the future or expired (Valid-to date before cutover).Validity DatesPF2/WP2

C1Missing or invalid Short TextMethod description (QMTT-KURZTEXT) missing in key business languages.Method TextPF2/WP2

C1Orphaned Method ReferenceInspection plan characteristic (PLMK) references an inspection method (QMTB) that does not exist or is inactive.Inspection Plan LinkPF2/WP2

C2Duplicate MethodsMultiple active inspection methods exist with the same Plant + Method ID + Version combination.Inspection MethodPF2/WP2

C2Missing Long TextsMethod flagged for long text (QMTT-LTEXTKZ) but no SO10 text maintained.Long TextPF2/WP2

C2Invalid Inspector QualificationMethod requires inspector qualification (QMTB-PRFQL) not available in customizing (TQ11).QualificationPF2/WP2

C3Obsolete Custom FieldsMethod contains legacy/custom fields that do not exist in S/4HANA; must be mapped or cleared.Mapping IssuePF2/WP2



Conversion Process

The high-level process is represented by the diagram below:

The ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process is a structured approach to data migration and management, ensuring high-quality data is seamlessly transferred across systems. Here’s a breakdown of its key components:

1. Extraction
The process begins with extracting metadata and raw data from source systems, such as Syensqo ECC system (i.e. WP2/PF2) periodically. The extracted data is then staged for transformation.


2. Transformation
Once extracted, the data undergoes cleansing, consolidation, and governance. This step ensures data integrity, consistency, and compliance with business rules. The transformation process includes:
- Data validation to remove inconsistencies.
- Standardization to align formats across datasets.
- Business rule application to refine data for operational use.


3. Loading
The transformed data is then loaded into the target S/4HANA system. 

image-2025-6-10_17-0-33.png



Data Privacy and Sensitivity

Not applicable


Extraction

Extract data from a source into . There are 2 possibilities:

  1. The data exists. connects to the source and loads the data into . There are 3 methods:
    1. Perform full data extraction from relevant tables in the source system(s).
    2. Perform extraction through the application layer.
    3. Only if ; cannot connect to the source, data is loaded to the repository from the provided source system extract/report.
  2. The data does not exist (or cannot be converted from its current state). The data is manually collected by the business directly in . This is to be conducted using DCT (Data Collection Template) in

The agreed Relevancy criteria is applied to the extracted records to identify the records that are applicable for the Target loads

Extraction Run Sheet

Req #Requirement DescriptionTeam Responsible
Extraction Scope Definition- Identify the source systems and databases involved.
- Define the data objects (tables, fields, records) to be extracted.
- Establish business rules for data selection.

Syniti / LTC Data team

Extraction Methodology- Specify the extraction approach (full, incremental, or delta extraction).
- Determine the tools and technologies used.
- Define data filtering criteria to exclude irrelevant records.
Syniti 
Extraction Execution Plan- Establish execution timelines and batch processing schedules.
- Assign responsibilities for extraction monitoring.
- Document dependencies on other migration tasks.
Syniti
Data Quality and Validation- Define error handling mechanisms for extraction failures.Syniti


Selection Screen

Selection Ref ScreenParameter NameSelection TypeRequirementValue to be entered/set
Not applicable



















Data Collection Template (DCT)

Target Ready Data Collection Template will be created for data with exception of some fields which require transformation as mentioned in the transformation rule.

DCT Rules

Field NameField DescriptionRule












Extraction Dependencies

Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible













Transformation

The Target fields are mapped to the applicable Legacy field that will be its source, this is a 3-way activity involving the Business, Functional team and Data team. This identifies the transformation activity required to allow to make the data Target ready:

  1. Perform value mapping and data transformation rules.
    1. Legacy values are mapped to the to-be values (this could include a default value)
    2. Values are transformed according to the rules defined in
  2. Prepare target-ready data in the structure and format that is required for loading via prescribed Load Tool. This step also produces the load data ready for business to perform Pre-load Data Validation

Transformation Run Sheet

Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible













Transformation Rules

Rule #Source systemSource TableSource FieldSource DescriptionTarget SystemTarget TableTarget FieldTarget DescriptionTransformation Logic









































Transformation Mapping

Mapping Table NameMapping Table Description








Transformation Dependencies

List the steps that need to occur before transformation can commence
Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible













Pre-Load Validation

Project Team

Completeness

TaskAction





Accuracy

TaskAction





Business

Completeness

TaskAction





Accuracy

TaskAction





Load

The load process includes:

  1. Execute the automated data load into target system using load tool or product the load file if the load must be done manually
  2. Once the data is loaded to the target system, it will be extracted and prepared for Post Load Data Validation

Load Run Sheet

Item #Step DescriptionTeam Responsible













Load Phase and Dependencies

Configuration

Item #Configuration Item






Conversion Objects

Object #Preceding Object Conversion Approach

list the exact title of the conversion object of only the immediate predecessor – this will then confirm the DDD (Data Dependency Diagram)




Error Handling

Error TypeError DescriptionAction Taken










Post-Load Validation

Project Team

Completeness

TaskAction





Accuracy

TaskAction





Business

Completeness

TaskAction





Accuracy

TaskAction





Key Assumptions

  • Master Data Standard is up to date as on the date of documenting this conversion approach and data load.
  • is in scope based on data design and any exception requested by business.


See also

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 8) May 05, 2026 12:25 REDDY-ext, Naren Set the DRAD table to not used - PDM-1622
v. 31 Feb 24, 2026 11:41 REDDY-ext, Naren Removed the CUI object statement from Purpose
v. 30 Feb 17, 2026 14:42 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated the dct for Long text fields
v. 29 Feb 16, 2026 14:22 REDDY-ext, Naren Added column in DCT for mapping
v. 28 Feb 16, 2026 14:20 REDDY-ext, Naren Split the QMTT to separate sheet
v. 27 Feb 09, 2026 14:11 REDDY-ext, Naren Update DCT template alignment
v. 26 Feb 09, 2026 14:10 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated DCT section
v. 25 Nov 28, 2025 14:54 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated the Validation reports link(Post load validation)
v. 24 Nov 27, 2025 11:41 REDDY-ext, Naren Removed STXH-TDLOCK, STXL-TDSPO from transformation rules
v. 23 Nov 17, 2025 02:56 REDDY-ext, Naren Updated the scope of CUI

Go to Page History

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels