Consistency checks to be made before validating a “PIF level” profit center : if one of these conditions is not met, we need to challenge / reject the request
Status colour Blue title Step 1
Check the consistency between the data present in the code, in the short name and in the long description
Status colour Blue title Step 2
Check that the Reporting Division is within the validity dates in table ZZR_REPO_DIV
Status colour Blue title Step 3
In the
PIF: intable view
ZZRT179V,ZZRT179V control that
the “PIF flag” is ticked”, that it is not deleted and that we are within the validity period (we:
- The “ Flag PIF ” is ticked,
- The PIF is not deleted - The description of Product hierarchy can't contain *D*,
- The validity period - We cannot have profit centers at higher / lower levels of the hierarchy than the PIF
)
Status colour Blue title Step 4
Check the Business area assignment in the production plant is consistent with the Reporting division present in the profit center, in table view V_134G :
- Plant = plant corresponding to the industrial origin, via transaction ZPRI with the “Establishment” of the industrial origin - take into account that it can be not the 3-character code but one of the 4-character code derived from that one; check also that this Establishment is still active / valid in that transactioncode where the material is going to be extended. If it's a production plant you can check its validity via transaction ZPRI,
Product division = the one corresponding to the PIF, in table view ZZRT179V,
- The Business area indicated in view V_134G must be consistent with the Reporting division of the profit center.
| Viewtracker | ||
|---|---|---|
|