You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

 

Consistency checks to be made before validating a “PIF level” profit center : if one of these conditions is not met, we need to challenge / reject the request

STEP 1

Check the consistency between the data present in the code, in the short name and in the long description


 

STEP 2

Check that the Reporting Division is within the validity dates in table ZZR_REPO_DIV


STEP 3

Check the PIF: in table view ZZRT179V, control that the “PIF flag” is ticked”, that it is not deleted and that we are within the validity period (we cannot have profit centers at higher / lower levels of the hierarchy than the PIF) 


STEP 4

Check the Business area assignment in the production plant is consistent with the Reporting division present in the profit center, in table view V_134G :

 

  • Plant = plant corresponding to the industrial origin, via transaction ZPRI with the “Establishment” of the industrial origin - take into account that it can be not the 3-character code but one of the 4-character code derived from that one; check also that this Establishment is still active / valid in that transaction

  • Product division = the one corresponding to the PIF, in table view ZZRT179V

  • The Business area indicated in view V_134G must be consistent with the Reporting division of the profit center

 

STEP 5

Check that the other profit centers for the same PIF are linked to the same or other Reporting divisions, taking into account that they are exceptions, such as for PIF U* for utilities which can be assigned to several reporting divisions, as well as some product lines for which there are several Reporting divisions (e.g. chlorovinyls Russia <> Thailand <> Mercosur)


 

 

 

 

 

  • No labels