You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Status

  Approved

OwnerWENNINGER-ext, Sascha 
Stakeholders

Issue


Recommendation



Background & Context



Assumptions

  • The ERP Rebuild program aims to, where possible, deploy a single, global instance of every enterprise system in scope of the program. Separate instances for specific countries (e.g. China) are not being deployed, because a thorough investigation into the relevant legal, regulatory, strategic, and security aspects determined that adequate security controls could be attained in a single-instance system without physical separations. 
  • There are no technical barriers which limit access of Syensqo staff to the jurisdictions being considered for hosting the enterprise systems. Specifically Syensqo users located in mainland China are able to access business systems, including SaaS systems, via Syensqo-managed VPN tunnels regardless of the physical location of these systems. See also Specific architecture for China


Constraints

  • Due to the incumbency of the European Union as both the physical location for Syensqo's existing enterprise systems and data processing (e.g. by Shared Services staff in Portugal, management staff in Belgium and France), Syensqo do not have a comprehensive internal contractual framework for the export of various data from the EU to other jurisdictions. Scoping and implementing such a framework is a prerequisite for the implementation of enterprise systems outside of the EU. It may not be possible to fully implement the required contracts and processes within the timeline of the ERP Rebuild program. 


Impacts


Business Rules


Options considered

Option A: 


Option B: 


Option C: 


Option D: 


Evaluation



Option A
Located in USA

Option B
Located in EU
Legal/regulatory requirements for data localisation

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

Internal legal support, inc. data export and data processing agreements

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(minus)Con
Availability of SaaS applications(plus)Pro(minus)Con
Depth and breadth of technology platform components

Network latency impact for end users

Carbon footprint
(plus) The electricity grid in major European data center locations (e.g. Netherlands) tends to be marginally less CO₂-intensive than in major US locations (e.g. Virginia) when judged on an annual basis. For the year 2023, the CO₂ intensity of the Dutch grid on a consumption basis was 301gCO₂eq/kWh vs. 396gCO₂eq/kWh for Virginia. 
All major IaaS providers purchase electricity via long-term purchase agreements from power utilities, often under direct purchase agreements which favour renewable energy, rather than obtaining power directly from the national grid. They also tend to purchase renewable energy offsets for a large part of their operations (e.g. in 2023, AWS offset 100% of their carbon emissions in 22 Regions). Their actual CO₂ footprint is thus likely to be quite different to that of the national grid. 

See also

List of SAP Data Centres for SAP Cloud Services

Maps showing the carbon intensity of the electricity grid by geography


Regional coverage of relevant SAP SaaS and PaaS Solutions

A summary of the List of SAP Data Centres for SAP Cloud Services for products and services relevant for Syensqo is represented below. The information for this summary table was retrieved in September 2024, using the then-current version v.9-2024 of the document. 

Available of a product or service in only a single region in a particular geography may limit the Disaster Recovery options available for that service. This is thus represented as a paler shade of green in the table below. 

ProductEUUSChina
AI241
Application Development and Automation381
Customer Data Solutions221
Data and Analytics371
Data Custodian KMS120
Foundation / Cross-Services481
Integration381
Miscellaneous481
RISE with S/4HANA, Private Edition17186
SAP Advanced Financial Closing110
SAP Ariba111
SAP Ariba Buying110
SAP Asset Performance Management220
SAP Business Network221
SAP Cloud ALM211
SAP Cloud for Customer120
SAP Concur111
SAP CPQ110
SAP Digital Manufacturing220
SAP Document and Reporting Compliance Cloud100
SAP Sales & Service Cloud v2110
SAP SuccessFactors661
SAP Sustainability Control Tower110
SAP Test Automation by Tricentis110


No files shared here yet.

Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 2) Mar 25, 2026 19:01 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 39 Jan 29, 2026 03:47 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 38 Jan 29, 2026 03:41 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 37 Jan 22, 2026 08:06 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 36 Jan 22, 2026 07:31 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 35 Jan 19, 2026 13:22 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 34 Jan 07, 2026 16:08 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha Updated based on Andrea Jain's feedback that SAP is OOSA rather than CRMA.
v. 33 Dec 29, 2025 10:27 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha added links to DEFCERT documents
v. 32 Dec 29, 2025 09:51 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha updated following conclusion of the DEFCERT review of CMMC boundaries and controls.
v. 31 Apr 30, 2025 10:51 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha

Go to Page History

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels