You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

Issue

Syensqo has a legal obligation to create and exchange sales e-invoices with many global regulatory authorities. Additionally responses are often required back to confirm they have been correctly submitted. Without this information goods cannot be sold in these jurisdictions and fines can be imposed.


Recommendation

Use the S/4 functionality and integration provided in the ‘Document & Report Compliance’ toolset (DRC). This will provide the most robust, compliant, auditable and scalable solution for Syensqo whilst maximising ease of use.


Background & Context

Currently, e-invoice exchanges with the regulatory authorities are required when selling goods and services to the countries below - an e-invoice is sent to the authority and often a message is sent back to confirm the approval. Approximate invoice quantities shown below:

Country

Approx no of invoices per year

China

15000

Italy

3000

Mexico

1500

France

1500

Brazil

1000

Spain

1000

Belgium

400

Poland

250

Saudi Arabia

150

Peru

100

Chile

80

The number of countries that require this reporting is expected to rise each year - for example, all EU countries by 2028.

Even though there are similarities between the formats required they can differ substantially by each country. For example, Brazil has a different submission required depending upon the type of good or service sold.

Therefore Syensqo needs an efficient, robust and reliable method to send and receive the legally required sales invoice information.

Assumptions

Specific licence costs still need to be established with SAP - need to ensure future invoice volumes included in this estimation.

SAP S4/HANA will be the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) application that will enable the management and execution of the sales through to billing processes.

SAP keeps up the maintenance of the DRC to be compliant with the differing requirements of each country.

Constraints

The e-reporting tools chosen to support Finance and Procurement - there is also similar functionality required for tax and inbound invoice government submission / reporting - therefore this KDD should be considered as part of an overall e-documentation approach. (KDDs from Procurement & Finance to come)

Impacts

The initial configuration and testing of the DRC may take significant amount of technical resource and expertise. Even though many countries have a similar set up, each may have variances - in particular when comparing European country requirements to those of LATAM.

Additional licensing and therefore costs will be incurred for S/4 DRC solution.

Business Rules

None identified.

Options considered

1. Option A: Automate with SAP S/4 Document and Reporting Compliance.

The automated DRC functionality can operate in 3 x different ways to cover differing country specific requirements:

  1. Document and Reporting Compliance via cloud - exchanges an e-invoice in with selected governments in the format required via Peppol - e.g. Belgium, Poland, France. This is licensed by the number of documents processed.
  2. Document and Reporting Compliance via integration suite - exchanges an e-invoice with selected governments in the format required. For example, Saudi Arabia, Chile & Peru. Additionally, file format and transmission provided via integration suite for the Chinese Golden Tax transactions. Licensing?
  3. Document and Reporting Compliance for Brazil - exchanges an e-invoice with the Brazilian government in the format required using S/4 Nota Fiscal functionality. Licensing?

The basic flow is defined below:

Option B: Automate with 3rd party solution

This option would integrate a 3rd party provider software into S/4 in order to automate the exchange of sales invoice documents.

Use EDICOM as example?

Option C: Manual download / upload process from S/4 into government portal

This option would required manually downloading the sales invoice from S/4 in the correct format and then manually uploading this document into the relevant government authority portal.

Is this allowed? Check with Marcella what currently done 

Evaluation - in progress

The S/4 DRC is recommended for the key reasons below:

Compliance with Regulations:

  • SAP e-Invoicing supports compliance with global e-invoicing regulations, including those in countries like Italy, Brazil, Mexico, and others where e-invoicing is mandated by law.
  • The solution is regularly updated to keep pace with changing legal requirements.

Integration with SAP ERP:

  • Seamlessly integrates with SAP ERP systems (such as SAP S/4HANA and SAP ECC), allowing businesses to generate e-invoices directly from their existing financial and accounting processes.
  • Supports integration with third-party ERP systems as well.

Automated Invoice Processing:

  • Automates the entire invoicing process, reducing manual effort and the potential for errors.
  • Includes features for automated validation, approval, and transmission of invoices.

Standardized Formats:

  • Supports multiple e-invoicing formats (such as XML, UBL, EDIFACT) to ensure compatibility with various regional standards and trading partners' requirements.
  • Facilitates the exchange of structured invoice data between different systems and organizations.

Secure and Reliable Transmission:

  • Ensures secure transmission of invoices using encryption and secure communication protocols.
  • Provides tracking and audit trails to ensure transparency and accountability.

Cost Savings and Efficiency:

  • Reduces the costs associated with paper invoicing, including printing, mailing, and storage.
  • Accelerates invoice processing times, leading to faster payment cycles and improved cash flow.

Real-time Monitoring and Reporting:

  • Offers real-time monitoring of invoice status and performance metrics.
  • Provides comprehensive reporting tools to analyze invoicing data and gain insights into financial operations.

Global Reach:

  • Supports multi-language and multi-currency invoicing, making it suitable for businesses operating in multiple countries.

S/4 DRC

3rd Party
Manual
Global compliance

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

S/4 integration

(plus)Pro

(minus)Con

(minus)Con

(plus)Pro

(plus)Pro

Automated document exchange(plus)Pro(minus)Con(minus)Con
Standardized document format


Secure transmission


Roll-out costs


Roll-out complexity


Maintenance cost


Real-time monitoring and reporting


See also

DRC with cloud process flow:

DRC with integration suite process flow:


Change log

Version Published Changed By Comment
CURRENT (v. 14) Mar 04, 2025 11:26 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 67 Mar 04, 2025 11:23 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 66 Mar 04, 2025 11:16 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 65 Sept 03, 2024 10:23 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 64 Jul 26, 2024 16:03 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 63 Jul 26, 2024 11:35 MCCARTNEY-ext, Stephen
v. 62 Jul 25, 2024 12:21 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 61 Jul 23, 2024 11:11 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 60 Jul 19, 2024 09:43 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 59 Jul 18, 2024 16:25 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 58 Jul 18, 2024 16:03 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 57 Jul 18, 2024 15:06 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 56 Jul 18, 2024 15:03 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha aligned page title
v. 55 Jul 18, 2024 15:01 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha updated diagrams, some wording changes
v. 54 Jul 18, 2024 12:53 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 53 Jul 18, 2024 11:38 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha added table showing DRC pattern per country
v. 52 Jul 18, 2024 10:41 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 51 Jul 15, 2024 11:26 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 50 Jul 15, 2024 11:17 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 49 Jul 15, 2024 10:34 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 48 Jul 15, 2024 10:33 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 47 Jul 15, 2024 10:32 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 46 Jul 15, 2024 10:27 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 45 Jul 15, 2024 10:24 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 44 Jul 15, 2024 10:23 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 43 Jul 15, 2024 10:22 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 42 Jul 15, 2024 10:21 GONZALVEZ-ext, Antonio
v. 41 Jul 12, 2024 11:04 MCCARTNEY-ext, Stephen
v. 40 Jul 12, 2024 10:48 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 39 Jul 12, 2024 10:47 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 38 Jul 11, 2024 16:20 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 37 Jul 11, 2024 16:16 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 36 Jul 11, 2024 16:04 MCCARTNEY-ext, Stephen
v. 35 Jul 11, 2024 16:01 MCCARTNEY-ext, Stephen
v. 34 Jul 11, 2024 16:00 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 33 Jul 11, 2024 15:52 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 32 Jul 11, 2024 14:05 MCCARTNEY-ext, Stephen
v. 31 Jul 11, 2024 13:13 MCCARTNEY-ext, Stephen
v. 30 Jul 11, 2024 11:13 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 29 Jul 10, 2024 17:13 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 28 Jul 10, 2024 17:09 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 27 Jul 10, 2024 17:07 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 26 Jul 10, 2024 17:06 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 25 Jul 10, 2024 16:43 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 24 Jul 10, 2024 14:35 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 23 Jul 10, 2024 14:31 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 22 Jul 10, 2024 14:19 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 21 Jul 10, 2024 13:30 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 20 Jul 10, 2024 13:12 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 19 Jul 10, 2024 13:04 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 18 Jul 09, 2024 12:49 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 17 Jul 09, 2024 12:46 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 16 Jul 09, 2024 12:26 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 15 Jul 08, 2024 18:17 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 14 Jul 08, 2024 18:13 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 13 Jul 08, 2024 17:53 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 12 Jul 08, 2024 17:22 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 11 Jul 08, 2024 17:18 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 10 Jul 08, 2024 17:13 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 9 Jul 08, 2024 17:09 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 8 Jul 08, 2024 17:01 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 7 Jul 08, 2024 16:53 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 6 Jul 08, 2024 16:49 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 5 Jul 04, 2024 17:43 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 4 Jul 04, 2024 17:42 HALL-ext, Simon
v. 3 Jul 03, 2024 12:39 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 2 Jul 03, 2024 12:09 WENNINGER-ext, Sascha
v. 1 Jun 21, 2024 16:38 HALL-ext, Simon

Workflow history

Title Last Updated By Updated Status  
There are no pages at the moment.

  • No labels