The P&L (Profit and Loss) application it’s part of the Finance domain using data from SAP systems, non-ERP system and BFC information based on data from COPA (Controlling - Profitability Analysis) a component from SAP CO module.
P&L application provides reports fully aligned with BFC structure (BFC Headings) down to REBIT/REBITDA able to analyze P&L starting from the BFC view (Company/Activity) and ability to drill down to Customer Material level.
A profit and loss statement (P&L) is a financial statement that summarizes the revenues, costs and expenses incurred during a specific period of time, usually a fiscal quarter or year.
These records provide information about a company's ability – or lack thereof – to generate profit by increasing revenue, reducing costs, or both.
VERSION | DATE | MODIFIED BY | DESCRIPTION |
0.01 | 24.07.2023 | Inês Vilares | Initial draft |
| Data Product Type |
|
| Technologies |
|
Data Sources Note: list of all applications and various environment |
|
2.0 Business Process
The P&L information is generate by the SAP Controlling (CO) module.
The process starts in the controlling part where we don't have the data organized to be aligned with the guidelines from the oficial report tool. In this way, Solvay uses the Business Financial Consolidation (BFC) tool to have the data in compliance and generate the oficial reports to the company. For this, all the operating financial data are stored in SAP systems and exist and interface to extract data to be translated to BFC format and generate the file to upload in BFC.
Also, Solvay uses the SAP Business Warehouse (SAP BW) tool to extract reports with data coming from the transactional systems (mainly WP1 & PF1) that enable the compay to have the adjustments/enhacement for some fields/calculations to allow the users to realize their analysis on a more efficient way and to perform checkings/controls on the P&L data in alignment with BFC struture. In SAP BW, you can integrate, transform, and consolidate relevant business information from productive SAP applications and external data sources.
SAP BW levereged the P&L in the following ways:
- P&L report aligned with BFC structure (BFC Headings) down to REBIT / REBITDA;(Non core Group activites_ CM)
- Data available at BFC View (Company / Activity) and ability to drill down to Customer / Material level;
- Unique P&L for all entities using Solvay Core Systems (PF1+WP1);
- Dynamic restatement of periods based on automatic rules;
- Consolidation figures as in BFC, allowing P&L at GBU level aligned with group definitions;
- Currency conversion as in BFC;
- CICC data taken directly from BFC;
- Interface to upload data from other ERP than WP1/PF1;
- Elimination Profit in Inventory (R15430) available in the reporting;
- Query for monthly data and YTD data follow up;
- Reconciliation query BFC vs BW for P&L;
CO Structure:
Overview of the business process in P&L
In the process the data is in the SAP CO module where we have the different phases until the information has the struture aligned with BFC to become in the end the final data to be reported.
Cost objects controlling:
A cost object can be used to analyze target costs, actual costs, and variances in situations where costs are not collected at the level of orders or materials. For example:
- Fixed costs and activity costs planning;
- Actual costs postings from cost centers, orders, projects;
Product Costing:
The flow of the product costing is composed of a series of standard transactions which are interconnected. This requires the processing in a certain sequence. The procedure starts in the cost center accounting referring to so-called production cost centers. Defined activity types are assigned to these cost centers. For the daily movements the activity prices are valuated at standard cost. In the closing of the product costing they will be revaluated at actual prices. The differences are credited on the production cost centers and debited on the production cost collectors, managed in the cost object hierarchy.
The procedure continues with the distribution of postings of actual costs on the cost object level to the assigned cost collectors.
All categories of variances between target costs and actual costs, like price and quantity variances in raw and packaging materials, same for consumed activities are calculated within the cost object hierarchy and posted on cost collectors. As the cost collectors are a certain kind of order, they must be settled at the end of the period.
Intermediate checks take place in order to look at the ‘zero’ balance of the cost accounting objects involved.
To see more detil information about the process please check in the wiki page for "Costing - Knowledge Base".
Profitability Analysis (CO-PA): confirm with business
CO-PA provides P&L by market segment or strategic business unit such as enterprise, company code, plant, etc. The PF1 and WP1 systems use CO-PA to produce the P&L statements and FC interfaces (costing based version). To have the correct mapping exist a list of value fields which is aligned with FC requirements.
With the data from the cost objects already processed by the product costing we will have the information in CO-PA to be aligned with the BFC structure to present the financial reports.
For that we use the value field concept where is defined in the table ZWFAT110 for WP1 and table ZZF_BFC_COPA_VF for PF1.
Reports:
PF1 and WP1: CO-PA P&L reports: KE30
WP1: CO-PA line items: KE24
PF1: CO-PA line items: KE23N
3.0 Application Feature Overview
Below we have all the workbooks available:
| Reports | Definition | Prompts (some fields can be for multiple selections or a single value) | BW Workbook Query | Query Technical Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P&L Query | In a single report, the P&L of all legal entities of the GBU are displayed. The user can analyze the different KPI's (e.g. Net Sales, Contribution Margin, EBITDA, etc) and check the costs and sales for the company or companies depending on the selection of the user. It's possible to analyze the data for one month or more. | Mandatory fields:
Optional:
| BW_WBK_PL_0001 | BW_QRY_MVCOPA01_0001 |
| P&L Monthly Query | In a single report, the P&L of all legal entities of the GBU are displayed. The user can analyze the different KPI's (e.g. Net Sales, Contribution Margin, EBITDA, etc) and check the costs and sales for the company or companies depending on the selection of the user. In this report the user will see the data not for a specific month but for all months for the year selected in the prompts. Also the user can check the data by Quarter. If no currency is selected, no conversion is applied and data is extracted in local currency. For month 06/2018:Conversion will be the average exchange rate from 1 to 07 2018 – Average exchange rate from 1 to 6 2018); | Mandatory fields:
Optional:
| BW_WBK_PL_0002 | BW_QRY_MVCOPA01_0002 |
| P&L Monthly Query (Month Selected) | Same layout and fields as the P&L Monthly Query but the user only can select one month for the analysis. | Mandatory fields:
Optional:
| BW_WBK_PL_0009 | BW_QRY_MVCOPA01_0008 |
| P&L Reconciliation Query | P&L report presenting information about the costs and revenues, different KPI's for the comparison between the YTD Actual BW values and BFC Pack amounts. FC Pack column is for values when we use Conso = 0 and FC Conso will show values when we select Conso = 1. | Mandatory fields:
Optional:
| BW_WBK_PL_0003 | BW_QRY_MVCOPA01_0003 |
| P&L Query - Period Comparison | The report show the P&L information based in period 1 and period 2 to perform a comparison for actual data for the selected periods. The periods can be just one month or a range of months. | Mandatory fields:
Optional:
| BW_WBK_PL_0011 | BW_QRY_MVCOPA01_0006 |
| P&L Fixed Costs analysis | This represent only the measures related with fixed costs with the respective heading in BFC to see the values by default per GBU for one or more companies. | Mandatory fields:
Optional:
| BW_WBK_PL_0008 | BW_QRY_MVCOPA01_0001 |
4.0 Functional Specification
4.1 General Data/Calculations
For these reports, it’s important to understand some general concepts which are transversal to all the reports which allows the users to work with the reports in the same way as the SAP system and BFC tool.
| Consolidation View | The query takes the integration rate of the company and the partner from a table managed by GAR (Group Accounting Reporting).
The formula to retrieve the consolidated sales is in line with BFC: Consolidated Sales = Amount * Max [ 0, Integration Rate of CY (tingsoc) - Integration Rate of Partner (tingpart) ] Internal Sales = Amount * Min [ Integration Rate of CY (tingsoc), Integration Rate of Partner (tingpart) ] The integration rate of the partner is managed on the TRADING PARTNER. For specific cases some external customer must be considered as internal for certain company code (joint venture for example) . For cases the Partner integration rate is taken at the crossing Sold To/Company code. In this way, the user has 4 options:
|
|---|---|
| GBU Assignment | The concept for GBU doesn't exist in SAP but it’s a requirement to have in BW since in BFC we have this definition. This GBU assignment is different for WP1 and PF1 and it will be explain in detail in the Process Definition section. |
| Exchange Rate | P&L Exchange will be explain in detail in the Process Definition section. See below some links usefull for the exchange rates:
|
| PRS Concept | The PRS is one dedicated SAP environment (based on PF1) whose aim is to unify some structural information as Master Data information for customers, vendors, company codes, etc. For this, depending on each master data we are referring to, we have specific tables created to maintain the data and have the configuration from source systems to BFC definition and alignment. |
| Value Fields concept | CO-PA is an hypercube (like a pivot table in excel) where figures are posted to value fields. Value fields are mapped to BFC accounts in the interface tables. |
| Annual Closing | Each end of year, the main BW master data (about the structure) which are not time-dependent need to be frozen = no more loading from ECC or flat file on these main master data. To avoid the impact of the new evolution scheduled for next year on the yearly closing a freeze is applied to block the loading to allow the yearly closing period with the same scope done for the year and not with inputs for next year, for some master data, the loading are freeze in the middle of December until end of January. So when there is a new organization, historical data is restated in BW (not in SAP and BFC). |
4.2 Process Detail
4.2.1. Report/Process Definition
| Domain | Finance |
|---|---|
| Application | BW reports under P&L folder |
| Provider | MVCOPA01 (main P&L data) |
| Existing Documentation | https://wiki.solvay.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20886860 https://wiki.solvay.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20882904 |
SAP BW High level view:
To see the data from the source systems see below how the information is organized in the BW perspective:
GBU Assignment
See below the logic for WP1 and PF1:
WP1 Logic:
An IECRA is the combination of:
- a division: groups of similar products or product lines produced with the same technology.
- and a distribution channel: channel through which saleable materials or services reach the customer.
IECRA are grouped into CDPRF (=Profit center carat) - A CDPRF corresponds to the "Activity 1" in BFC
CDPRF are grouped into ENTRP (enterprise codes) - The ENTRP corresponds to the "Group of Activities" in BFC
ENTRP are then grouped into ZSECT - The ZSECT code corresponds to the GBU in BFC
You can display the structure with WP1 - Report ZWFAR571 - Reporting structure axes
Determination of the IECRA in COPA (KE30 - Profitability report)
Depending on information available in the posting, the determination of the IECRA differs:
For sales & standard costs of goods sold
The IECRA is determined with the combination of:
- The division and a the distribution channel = DV x DC
For purchase price & process orders variances + Revaluation
There is a unique link Profit Center-IECRA
Usually the last 4 digit of the profit center is equal to the last 4 digits of the corresponding IECRA.
For cost centers
Costs posted in a cost center are assigned to the P&L through an assessment cycle that is maintained in KEU3 - Dislay actual assessment to CO-PA.
PF1 Logic:
In PF1, the determination of the business structure is done in the P&L (KE30 - Profitability report) using the profit center of the COPA posting.
The following rule is applicable when the codification of the profit center starts with a D or a F. When the code of the profit center starts with another letter (ex: S, E or C), it can not be allocated to a business.
When the code of the profit center starts with D or F, the system looks at the Profit center name in english.
It can be displayed with KE53 - Display Profit Center
The system takes the position 2 & 3 of the Profit center name. It corresponds to the reporting division.
In some cases, the "reporting division" is replaced by the "converted division". It is done using the exception table ZZR_REPO_DIV_EXC that is maintained at company code level.
The activity 1 is determined with the table ZZF_BFC_DIV_COVV using the original or converted reporting division.
The group of activities is determined with the table ZZR_REPO_DIV using the original or converted reporting division.
The GBU is determined using the group of activities with the table ZZR_REPO_SBU
Partner Activity
Identify the business to which the amounts are allocated in the Solvay partner company in cross-company flows. See below the different logic for WP1 and PF1.
Determination of the partner activity in WP1
In WP1, a partner activity 1 / group of activities / GBU is done when the movement type in COPA (KE30 - Profitability report) is equal to:
- 01 - vente intra cdp
- 10 - vente inter entrepr.
- 13 - Vte OMC zone EUROPE
- 15 - vente inter cdp
If there is no movement type, no partner activity 1 is determined.
Depending on the movement type, the program will look at different tables until it find the right correspondance as detailed below.
If there is a missing entry in a table, contact SBS support.
01 - vente intra cdp
The partner activity 1 is the same as the activity 1
10 - vente inter entrepr.
1. Table ZWFAT176
BW starts by looking at the table ZWFAT176 - FC – company code/IECRA/company/Ship-to (mvt 10)
If it finds the combination Company Code x IECRA x Trading partner x Ship-To Party then the partner activity = GBU = 00
Ex: the combination 3865 x IECRA01169 x 4274 x 85392 = BFC Partner Activity CH + 00 = CH00
2. Table ZWFAT118
If no combination can be found in the table ZWFAT176 then the system looks at the table ZWFAT118 FC – company code/enterprise/company/PRCOM (mvt 10)
If it finds the combination Company Code x Enterprise x Trading partner x Commercial product then the partner activity = GBU = 00
3. Table ZWFAT119
If no combination can be found in the table ZWFAT118 then the system looks at the table ZWFAT119 FC – company code/enterprise/company (mvt 10)
If it finds the combination Company Code x Enterprise x Trading partner then the partner activity = GBU = 00
Ex: the combination 3865 x ENTRP00046 x 4274 = BFC Partner Activity CH + 00 = CH00
4. Table ZWFAT113
If no combination can be found in the table ZWFAT119 then the system looks at the table ZWFAT113 FC - ENTERPRISES
If it finds the combination Company Code x Enterprise then the partner activity = GBU = 00
13 - Vte OMC zone EUROPE
The partner activity 1 = MZ00
15 - vente inter cdp
1. Table ZWFAT116
BW starts by looking at the table ZWFAT116 - MAGNITUDE - company code/partner IECRA/comp/PRCOM (mvt 15)
If it finds the combination Company Code x IECRA x Trading partner x Commercial product then the partner activity = MGN Market
2. Table ZWFAT117
If no combination can be found in the table ZWFAT116 then the system looks at the table ZWFAT117 FC - company code/partner IECRA/company (mvt 15)
If it finds the combination Company Code x IECRA x Trading partner then the partner activity = FC Market
3. Table ZWFAT113
If no combination can be found in the table ZWFAT117 then the system looks at the table ZWFAT113 FC - ENTERPRISES
If it finds the combination Company Code x Enterprise then the partner activity = FC Market
Overview - determination of the partner activity in WP1
Determination of the partner activity in PF1
Overview - determination of the partner activity in PF1
Non-ERP data in P&L:
Procedure to upload manually data from systems not interfaced with WBP.
On the business side they need to fill 3 dedicated templates to upload the data into WBP:
For customers master data: NON ERP - Model Customers master data
For material master data: NON ERP - Model Materials master data
For P&L data: NON ERP - Model structure of the P&L
For this, they need to also have in consideration the following information:
When everything is ready the users can go to WBP systema and use upload the file in the transaction ZPL_FILE. Once it is done a message is displayed to inform that the file was sent to BW and will be available in the reporting at the next data loading.
Data loading time: 12am / 1pm / 6pm (french time)
Transaction Customizing: NERP Source system
In order to avoid data overwriting, master data Customer & Material and transactional data must be attached to a system source starting with NERP* (for example NERP001 or NERPCYT).
So the business will need to create a new NERP source system and add 2 entries one for GM and one for ZBW_PL_PC:
For ZBW_PL_PC stream if they have this active (Y) option mean Profit center is mandatory and using c_glbfilt parameter (steam = "FULLFF", rule = "NERP"), they control the list of source systems for which a full flat file is required:
Exchange Rates in P&L
Several conversion methods can be used in BW. The aim of this page is to explain the main methods used in BW:
- CAR3 - Monthly Rate
- C - Year-to-date Monthly Average Rate
- BFC Methodology
CAR3 - Monthly Rate
The rate CAR3 can be found in the GAR library. It is available in the sheet "Taux - Rates (Monthly)". It corresponds to average rate of the month.
C - Year-to-date Monthly Average Rate
Year-to-date Monthly Average Rate comes from BFC. It is the sum of monthly rates divided by the number of months from the beginning of the year.
The Rate C can be found in the GAR library. It corresponds to the rate "MOYEN / AVERAGE" in the sheet "Taux - Rates"
BFC Methodology
The aim is to use the same methodology as the one used in BFC
- It is used in queries/workbooks with "monthly" in their descriptions
Example
2 materials are sold in USD with the following contribution margin in local currency in Q1 2019:
| Material | Description | 01.2019 | 02.2019 | 03.2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11365 | OT MET.DRUM 225L | $ 26 560,00 | $ 13 280,00 | $ 13 280,00 |
| 11366 | DISTIL. BULK. | $ 557 522,40 | $ 387 991,60 | $ 390 042,00 |
The rate C by month is:
| Month | 01.2019 | 02.2019 | 03.2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate 1 EUR = x USD | 1,141686 | 1,138501 | 1,135740 |
In February, the contribution margin (=CTN) of the material 11365 OT MET.DRUM 225L is
= (CTN 01.2019 + CTN 02.2019) x Rate C 02.2019 - CTN 01.2019 x Rate C 01.2019
= ($ 26 560,00 + $ 13 280,00) x 1,138501 - $ 26 560,00 x 1,141686 = 11 729,54 EUR
BW is doing the calculation item by item.
In February the CTN of material code 11366 DISTIL. BULK. = ($ 557 522,40 + $ 387 991,60) x 1,138501 - $ 557 522,40 x 1,141686 = 342 157,77 EUR
| Material | Description | 01.2019 | 02.2019 | 03.2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11365 | OT MET.DRUM 225L | 23 263,83 EUR | 11 729,54 EUR | 11 777,90 EUR |
| 11366 | DISTIL. BULK. | 488 332,35 EUR | 342 157,77 EUR | 345 444,82 EUR |
Note
The exchange rate used for the conversion of the material code 11365 is $ 13 280,00 / 11 729,54 EUR = 1,13218. It is different from the one used for the material 11366 = $ 387 991,60 / 342 157,77 EUR = 1,13395
Notes
1- Difference between Rate C & Rate CAR3:
See the following example.
- In January the rate CAR3 is equal to 1,21, in February it is equal to 1,24 and in March it is equal to 1,20.
- In January the rate C is equal to the rate CAR3 but in February it is the sum of the CAR3 of January and February divided by 2 months. In March it is the sum of the rate CAR3 of January, February, March divided by 3 months.
2- We need to use a specific workbook when we want to work with the BFC methodology because when using a monthly query, BW recalculates all the items of the query with the BFC calculation methodology. It does not apply a single exchange rate but it is a complex calculation that can not be done in a standard query.
3- The recommendation for which rate we should use is:
- If you want to have the same result as BFC, you must use a query with "monthly" in its description. However the response time can be deteriorated as BW calculates the conversion rate for all items.
- By default the rate C is used in the applications FC - Create a fixed costs report & P&L Reporting (WBP). Month by month it can not be aligned with BFC but it is when you look at the full year. The response time is better than monthly queries.
- You must use the rate CAR3 if you want to have the same result as CRM Analytics Dashboard.
Should I add this list for the characteristics?
4.2.2. KPI's/Calculations/Indicators - Double check this part
Indicators available:
- XXX
- XXX
Indicatores/KPI's | Definition | Calculation/Extraction of data |
|---|---|---|
5.0 Non-functional Descriptions
5.1 Usability
Usability is about the ease with which a User can learn to start using the solution and the ease with which they can use the system. In addition to ease of learning and ease of use, usability also includes areas such as ease of recall, error avoidance and handling, accessibility among others e.g., 99% of metadata entry Users who have use the Maintenance Dashboard should be able to change filters, extract etc., when required. Maintenance data will be centrally stored in the Google Cloud platform, which will be available to other applications e.g., and Dashboards if needed.
Software systems must comply with legal and regulatory e.g., GDPR requirements, this can change depending on country, organisation industry and / or region. The software systems must be secure from unauthorized access. The Maintenance Dashboard will comply with Solvay’s regulations and compliance e.g., access only granted to authorized Users.
5.3 Security
Security refers to essential aspects that assure a solution and its components will be protected against unauthorized access or malware attacks. Important considerations related to security aspects of a system are User authentication, User authorization or User access privileges, data theft, malware attacks, data encryption, and maintaining audit trails, e.g., only Users with administrator access shall be able to create new accounts and assign data access privileges to the new accounts e.g.,
All data will be encrypted in the dashboard
Only authorised Users / Administrative Users will be able to access data.
Maintenance data will be split between either SCO or ECO, and Users will only have authority to one Entity data.
5.4 Performance
Performance defines how fast a software system or a particular section of it responds to certain User actions under a certain workload. In most cases, this metric explains how long a User must wait before the target operation happens e.g., the page renders, a transaction is processed, etc., given the overall number of Users now. Performance requirements may describe background processes invisible to Users, e.g., backup and speed of data transfers.
5.5 Reliability
Reliability is the ability of a solution or its component to perform its required functions without failure under predefined conditions for a specified time / period. Reliability can possibly be specified in terms of average time system runs before failure occurs, percentage of operations completed successfully within a time / period, maximum acceptable failure probability, or number of failures within a period. Reliability aspects are in reference to (but not limited to) evaluation of the system to be considered as reliable, classification of reliability defining failures vs. regular failures, and the impact of failure on business operations. The Maintenance Dashboard will display data from the previous refresh of data.
5.6 Scalability
Scalability refers to the degree to which a solution can evolve to handle increased amounts of work. The increased amount of work could be in terms of the user base, transactions, data, network traffic, or other factors e.g., the system should be able to handle an additional load of a maximum of 5,000 Users every month for the next 6 months without any noticeable performance impacts.
5.7 Compatibility
Interoperability is the degree to which the solution is compatible with other components. It is a measure of how effectively the system interoperates with other software systems and how easily it integrates with external hardware devices.
Interoperability aspects to be discussed during elicitation are in reference to (but not limited to) software systems to be interfaced with along with data / messages to be exchanged and any standard data formats, hardware components to be integrated with, and any standard communication protocols to be followed e.g., Order Management system will push the order file into a secured file transfer protocol server from where it will be loaded into the system through a daily job. To guarantee between Google Cloud platform and SAP BW Queries e.g., BW_QRY_MVPMOR01_0002, Solvay has introduced a new tool called Xtract (Xtract).
5.8 Availability
Availability is the degree to which the solution is operable and accessible when required. It is a measure of time during which the system is fully operational e.g., available for use and sometimes included as a Service Level Agreement (SLA) considering its criticality to the business, e.g., the system shall be at least 99% available on weekdays between 09:00 to 18:30 Central European Time (CET).
5.9 Refresh of the Data
Closing Time:
Outside of Closing: the reload of data is 1x/ day during in the night


































